You instructed us: A ton of you would invest in a pricier Notice 20 with a headphone jack

Samsung’s Galaxy Observe line has typically been for people who want more out of their smartphones — far more display, extra battery, more multitasking functions. That is, until eventually the Galaxy Observe 10. Samsung followed the sector and removed the headphone jack from the Notice 10 collection, marking an appealing shift in the Notice line’s philosophy. This, definitely, turned several persons away from the Take note.

But what if Samsung introduced again the headphone jack in the Galaxy Be aware 20? If a Note 20 variant with a headphone jack went for, say, $50 more, would you invest in it? We questioned you this really concern very last 7 days. Out of approximately 25,000 overall votes, the all round benefits feel to be very break up.

Would you spend $50 further for a Galaxy Notice 20 with a headphone jack?

Outcomes

There’s a large amount to dig into right here. Over-all, the success are split virtually down the middle. 53.3% of voters explained they would not get a headphone jacked Take note 20 for $50 further, whilst 46.7% reported they would.

Voters on the website and Instagram unquestionably voted in favor of the headphone jack returning. 63.55% on the web page and 55.36% of voters on Instagram said they’d commit the added income.

Matters played out a little bit otherwise on Twitter and Fb. 53% of Twitter voters and 63% of Facebook voters mentioned they would not shell out the extra $50 for a headphone jack.

Do we imagine Samsung would basically make a Notice 20 with a headphone jack? In all probability not. But if it did, it would evidently be pretty well known with Observe admirers.

Here’s what you experienced to say

Right here are some of the ideal feedback from very last week’s poll describing why they voted the way that they did:

• JosephHindy: If it had been an LG model jack with an Amp and dac in it, hell yeah.But a regular headphone jack fees like a portion of a cent in bulk, an up demand like that is ridiculous.So, my response is maybe lol.
• DBS: Is that $50 headphone jack an LG headphone jack with the large good quality quadDAC in it? ’cause that is the only way a headphone jack would value $50.In any case, I won’t obtain a cell phone without a headphone jack, no subject the cost. If I’m now paying out +1000€ for a cellphone, it ought to have all the things built in, like a headphone jack. How considerably the headphone jack prices the OEM is of no worry to me.
• Itamar Baum: I would have to say no, but it is not because I never assume the headphone jack is really worth $50, it is more to you to the fact which is just a imagined eradicating a characteristic that is always there and then charging a quality for it makes me nauseous. What’s upcoming? Pay back more for having an ear piece?
• Bob Veats: That $50 is ridiculous. What does the component in fact price tag to put in the mobile phone, 20 cents? I want the jack, and I’ll invest in the cellular phone that offers it to me. I never want to drag a $10 dongle close to that hold me from employing headphones and charging the mobile phone at the exact same time. With all the other sensors, bells and whistles I do not use day to day, I do not want to acquire $200 pair of wi-fi headphones that wants daily charging possibly.
• KEVIN: Would spend $150 for a removable battery
• cnote0127: Let me rephrase the problem?…will I buy a cell phone without having the jack….no.
• Kyle Turner: I WOULD NOT Spend $50.00 FOR A Take note 20, Period (unless of course I was absolutely free to market it unused on ebay). In point, if I had to preserve the Take note 20 and use it, I’d have no curiosity if the cost was $.00 (free)! I’m a former Samsung Note cellphone loyalist who hates what Samsung did to the Be aware Phones, starting off with the Observe 7. Samsung can hold its no headphone jack, curved edge display and display screen component ratio that is taller/narrower than 16:9! 😝
• ShawnSnow: 3rd choice: No. A good deal of other telephones that present a person at no supplemental rate.
• DiamondDNice: definitely. I use the headphone jack at perform mainly because bluetooth does not past all working day on a one battery cost. That reported the take note is too enormous and interestingly the Samsung 10e is a major possibility for my subsequent phone simply because it has a headphone jack and is not a huge cell phone.I’d add that, there are likely lots of lots of other “features” that I’d gladly lose just before a headphone jack. Many of the function, facial area unlock for illustration, are not specially essential to me. I’d take a camera that is $20 cheaper to get a headphone jack.
• pda96: I am a huge lover of the jack. And I want a jack on each and every cellular phone. But $50 is too much.
• Jeffrey Raphael: I use Bluetooth, so I really don’t treatment about the headphone jack.Why would everyone want to fork out excess for a thing that earlier Galaxy Note telephones had?That does not make any feeling.

Which is it for this week. As usually, many thanks for voting, thanks for the feedback, and don’t overlook to allow us know what you assumed of the benefits below.